Subscribe to Cruise Radio News Daily Updates.
Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting stuff and updates to your email inbox.
A couple, who decided several hours into a cruise that it wasn’t right for them, left the ship in the wee hours of the morning and sought a full refund for the trip they’d willingly abandoned. They say their story is a cautionary one, but they may not understand the lesson to be learned.
Why They Opted Out Of The Cruise
According to a post on the Elliott Advocacy blog, Lori Rutt and her husband spent about a year doing research into what they believed would be the perfect vacation for them. They settled on the Sail Croatia ship Elegance with an itinerary that would take them from Dubrovnik to Split. Rutt said that because they aren’t necessarily the type of people to do group tour-type trips, they’d never cruised. “But to see the islands,” she explained, “we felt that a small ship cruise would be our best bet.”
They claim that of particular interest to them was a line in the cruise line’s promotional material indicating that their room would have air conditioning. But when they arrived in their room on embarkation day, they found it to be uncomfortably warm and stuffy. In quick succession, Rutt discovered several other problems: including a burnt-out light bulb and mold in the corner of the shower.
Upon attempting to take their complaints to the crew, the pair ran into a problem: Given that the ship was not set to sail until the next morning, there were few actual crew members on board. Eventually, the onboard manager did accompany Rutt and her husband to the stateroom in question. The manager agreed that it was stuffy, and said they would address the problems in the morning.
READ MORE: 7 Outrageous Refund Demands
By morning, however, the couple had decided they no longer wanted to set sail on the Elegance. Fearing they might spend the entire trip sweltering, and put off by the other issues they’d had, they decided to call it quits. They e-mailed their contact at the cruise company, saying, “At this point, we just want to get off the boat as soon as possible, and get a complete refund. We will not be continuing on the cruise tomorrow and will speak to the first staff member we can locate tonight or at first light.” They disembarked at 7 a.m., with the help of the onboard manager, apparently assuming they would be able to get a refund of the $3,500 they’d paid for the ill-fated trip.
Do The Cruisers Deserve A Refund?
By now, most regular cruisers no doubt know that this story did not have a happy ending for Rutt and her spouse. As per the company’s policy, the fact that the couple had left the ship before giving the staff a chance to resolve the problem meant they would not be receiving a refund – full or otherwise. Stunned by this development, Rutt contacted her credit card company but found that they too were unable to issue a refund under the circumstances.
Eventually, she turned to Elliott Advocacy: a nonprofit organization that offers free advice to consumers in need, and often advocates on their behalf. However, after a rep from the group reviewed the information, they were left with no choice but to agree with the cruise line in believing that Rutt hadn’t given Sail Croatia an opportunity to address their concerns before disembarking.
“As I said from the very beginning,” Rutt told the Advocacy rep, “I really want our story to be heard, so that hopefully other travelers can learn from it. Between our experience, and reading some of the cruise stories on your website, I think this may have been our first and last cruise!”
The irony is that had Rutt and her spouse actually paid more attention to the stories which regularly appear on the Elliot Advocacy blog (or closely read the cruise contract), they’d have known that they had little-to-no shot at actually receiving a refund. Certainly, readers who responded to the blog’s poll understood that. When asked if Rutt was deserving of a refund under the circumstances, 87 percent of the respondents answered “no.”
Do you believe the couple in question is deserving of a refund? What would you have done under the circumstances?